I've watched a hell of a lot of TV this year, especially for me! Getting Neflix might have something to do with it. Here's what I watched:
Utopia Series 1
This could and should have been brilliant. Stylish and violent, but fell a little short of what I was hoping for.
Toast of London Series 1, 2, 3
Surreal and silly, frequently juvenile sitcom starring Matt Berry. The best bits are always in the booth.
Green Wing Series 1 and 2
Re-watched this sitcom set in a hospital. Another surreal one. Still don't get why Mark Heap isn't a huge star.
House of Cards Series 1
This is a bloody slog. A bit too mature for me. That is until people start getting murdered. Then it see-saws into becoming too far-fetched. Picky bastard aren't I? Well, they're all bastards in the show as well. Drive me fucking nuts.
The Office Series 1-7
Had a go at the American version, despite not wanting to tarnish my memories of Ricky Gervais' Slough-set original. It's decent. But it's made me go back to the original again. Very difficult to decide if Dwight or Gareth is the better creation. I love them both so damn much. The worst thing about this is that just as I was getting close to finishing the entire show, Netflix removed it.
Better Call Saul Series 1
Not Breaking Bad. Fun enough, but I don't think this is ever going to get close to its big brother.
Community Series 1-5
Or the Amazing Adventures of Abed. Can't believe they span this out to five seasons. I raced through them. Sometimes it was very easy to switch off while watching. Whole episodes would go by and I'd feel as though I had seen nothing. But then other episodes were so full of creativity, imagination and excitement, that it makes the show all worthwhile. Was gutted when Troy left though.
Game of Thrones Series 5
A bit frustrating. Lots of changes from the book that felt unnecessary. I wish they would just slow down and draw this out. Allow George to get his books written so we can enjoy them first. And why the fuck have we not got a little lady named Stoneheart yet? Seriously? Why change that? Why?
The Walking Dead Series 6
Good so far. Alexandria has been action-packed and the whole Glenn thing was awesome. Also, Morgan's episode of backstory was brilliant. Excuse me while I go and sign up to an Aikido class.
This is England 90
Without doubt, my favourite TV show of the year. Such a brilliant end to a brilliant saga. Tragic, yet also hopeful and incredibly bittersweet. The best performances and direction of the year. I've just got the 86-90 boxset for Christmas so I'll be putting myself through it all again. Shane Meadows and his wonderful cast nailed it. I will miss these characters, but this is the way it has to end. As much as I'd love to see them return, This is England 90 was the perfect send-off.
What did you watch? Any recommendations for me this year?
Pages
▼
Wednesday, 30 December 2015
Books of 2015: Found Footage, Film Studies for Dummies, Shock Value
I made a determined effort to read more film-related books this year. That started off very well with the first few books, but then petered out by the end of the year. This must also be the first year ever where every book I've read was non-fiction. Here's the books I read in 2015:
Found Footage Horror Films: Fear and the Appearance of Reality by Alexandra Heller-Nicholas
Just brilliant. Not many people are so devoted to studying these often very frustrating films. As I'm in the final year of my thesis on this subject, I read this at almost the perfect time. I managed to reference it a great deal in my thesis and I found it fascinating from cover to cover. I WISH I had read it before completing my book on The Blair Witch Project as Heller-Nicholas' analysis of that film would have given me a lot more to write about. The analysis of Paranormal Activity is also excellent and the detailing of how Highway Safety Films have influenced found footage was also something that I had not considered in my own thesis.
If you like found footage, or are just interested in its appeal, this is an absolute must read. Buy it here.
Film Studies for Dummies by Dr James Cateridge
I'd never read one of these 'for Dummies' books before and I thought that after 14 years of studying and teaching film studies, it would probably cover little that I didn't already know. Wow was I wrong. This book has been absolutely essential reading for me. It has clarified some of the most complex ideas in film studies, it has given me new ways to teach certain topics, it has broadened my knowledge of areas where I had little.
In short, it is a brilliant overview of the subject. I would recommend it for any student who is about to embark on Film Studies A level or a degree course. I think I learned more from this one book, than in much of my studies. Somehow it is perfectly pitched for both beginners and people who have been studying film for some time. Buy it here.
Shock Value by Jason Zinoman
Another must read for horror fans. Covers all the big classics from the 70s and the guys behind getting them made. It was especially timely to read this, as soon after I finished it, Wes Craven sadly passed away. Even though films like Texas Chainsaw, Halloween and The Exorcist have been written about to death already, Zinoman still manages to make this feel like a pretty fresh look at some of the greatest films ever to be unleashed from the genre. It would have been a good book to have around while writing my dissertation on the representation of the family in 70s horror. Buy it here.
12 Years a Slave by Solomon Northup
I saw this in a shop for something like £3 and as it was my favourite film of 2014, had to pick it up. A quick read and well worth it, even if you have seen the film. There are many harrowing parts and a quite a few memorable moments that were not included in the film. Overall, a story that deserves to be told and retold and retold.
Revolution by Russell Brand
Just a massive brain-fart really. I like Russell Brand and I like his outlook, but this came across as hopelessly naive in places. Still, there's lots of good stuff here and I hope Brand continues his crusade to try and change the world. I'm still listening.
The Hell of it All by Charlie Brooker
A collection of Brooker's columns for The Guardian. I laughed out loud a lot. After a whole book of reading Brooker's miserable ramblings, it can get a bit much. But he's still a brilliant writer and a lot of fun to read.
I'm also half way through Ayoade on Ayoade: A Cinematic Odyssey which is frankly, just bonkers.
What did you read this year? Any recommendations?
Found Footage Horror Films: Fear and the Appearance of Reality by Alexandra Heller-Nicholas
Just brilliant. Not many people are so devoted to studying these often very frustrating films. As I'm in the final year of my thesis on this subject, I read this at almost the perfect time. I managed to reference it a great deal in my thesis and I found it fascinating from cover to cover. I WISH I had read it before completing my book on The Blair Witch Project as Heller-Nicholas' analysis of that film would have given me a lot more to write about. The analysis of Paranormal Activity is also excellent and the detailing of how Highway Safety Films have influenced found footage was also something that I had not considered in my own thesis.
If you like found footage, or are just interested in its appeal, this is an absolute must read. Buy it here.
Film Studies for Dummies by Dr James Cateridge
I'd never read one of these 'for Dummies' books before and I thought that after 14 years of studying and teaching film studies, it would probably cover little that I didn't already know. Wow was I wrong. This book has been absolutely essential reading for me. It has clarified some of the most complex ideas in film studies, it has given me new ways to teach certain topics, it has broadened my knowledge of areas where I had little.
In short, it is a brilliant overview of the subject. I would recommend it for any student who is about to embark on Film Studies A level or a degree course. I think I learned more from this one book, than in much of my studies. Somehow it is perfectly pitched for both beginners and people who have been studying film for some time. Buy it here.
Shock Value by Jason Zinoman
Another must read for horror fans. Covers all the big classics from the 70s and the guys behind getting them made. It was especially timely to read this, as soon after I finished it, Wes Craven sadly passed away. Even though films like Texas Chainsaw, Halloween and The Exorcist have been written about to death already, Zinoman still manages to make this feel like a pretty fresh look at some of the greatest films ever to be unleashed from the genre. It would have been a good book to have around while writing my dissertation on the representation of the family in 70s horror. Buy it here.
12 Years a Slave by Solomon Northup
I saw this in a shop for something like £3 and as it was my favourite film of 2014, had to pick it up. A quick read and well worth it, even if you have seen the film. There are many harrowing parts and a quite a few memorable moments that were not included in the film. Overall, a story that deserves to be told and retold and retold.
Revolution by Russell Brand
Just a massive brain-fart really. I like Russell Brand and I like his outlook, but this came across as hopelessly naive in places. Still, there's lots of good stuff here and I hope Brand continues his crusade to try and change the world. I'm still listening.
The Hell of it All by Charlie Brooker
A collection of Brooker's columns for The Guardian. I laughed out loud a lot. After a whole book of reading Brooker's miserable ramblings, it can get a bit much. But he's still a brilliant writer and a lot of fun to read.
I'm also half way through Ayoade on Ayoade: A Cinematic Odyssey which is frankly, just bonkers.
What did you read this year? Any recommendations?
Thursday, 24 December 2015
Before The Hateful Eight: A Quentin Tarantino Retrospective
No director
in recent history deserves his name to become an adjective as much as Quentin
Tarantino. One of the most controversial figures of modern American film emerged from video store
geek to Sundance sensation with his both unique and familiar take on the crime
film, and immediately ‘Tarantino-esque’ was coined as an exciting way to
describe a slew of (often less than exciting) imitators influenced by the new
director. Now Tarantino is back with what promises to
be a bit of a return to his roots with The Hateful Eight looking a bit like a Western version of Reservoir Dogs.
Dabbling in
genres from samurai and kung-fu flicks to historical war films, Tarantino has a
definite style, numerous trademarks and a love of cult cinema that shines
through in every screenplay. A writer and director often criticised for the
levels of violence in his films, he is an auteur unafraid to court controversy.
From sadistic bank robbers to sadistic Nazis, Tarantino’s movie worlds are
littered with low-life scumbags that make life miserable for other characters.
Tarantino
has been known to divide critics, filmmakers and audiences with his vicious
violence, repeated racial epithets and the odd accusation of style over substance.
Spike Lee called him ‘infatuated’ with the ‘N’ word after its regular use in
Jackie Brown (1997) and notable uses in his previous two films. The BBFC
decided to pass Reservoir Dogs (1992) uncut but only after much debate over an
infamous torture scene. His later films like Death Proof (2007) and Inglourious
Basterds (2009) have received somewhat less critical adulation than his
earlier, more startling and fiercely independent works.
Reservoir
Dogs, released in 1992 is the genre defying debut of an ambitious young video
store geek burning to show his skills as both writer and director. It features
a cool cast including Harvey Keitel, Tim Roth and Steve Buscemi, buckets of
blood and in the middle of it all; joker Michael Madsen dancing, ear slicing
and ensuring the film a place in cinematic history. Inspired by the likes of
The Taking of Pelham One Two Three (1974) and its colour coded criminal names,
Kubrick’s The Killing (1956) and its fractured narrative structure and from
further afield Ringo Lam’s City of Fire (1987), whose final act it virtually
steals wholesale; it breaks the fundamental convention of a heist film. By
barely showing the actual robbery and only the fallout, it focuses on
characters including Tim Roth’s undercover cop and Madsen’s cold blooded
psychopath and fizzes with energy, wit and bloody sadistic violence.
Only two
years later, Tarantino returned with Pulp Fiction (1994), his undisputed masterpiece.
Borrowing liberally from French New Wave influences such as the films of Godard
and Truffaut and telling three stories linked only by gangster Marcellus
Wallace, it is a tour de force of film making; stylish, sexy, swear-y and sickening.
Samuel L. Jackson makes his first appearance in a Tarantino film beginning a
long collaboration that continues today. Never has Tarantino’s dialogue flowed
as richly as between the similarly clad gangsters to Reservoir Dogs' characters,
Jules and Vincent. And never have Tarantino’s monologues been so juicily delivered
as Samuel L. Jackson’s iconic delivery of Ezekiel 25:17. The non-linear
narrative, brutal violence and chapter titles crystallised, confirming
Tarantino as a unique director, borrowing continually from his cinematic heroes
and creating memorable and original works of crime fiction.
He then
adapted Elmore Leonard’s novel Jackie Brown into an infinitely more mature, but
less stylish and snappily scripted homage to Blaxploitation films of the 70s.
It bears all the marks of a director comfortable in his new shoes as the king
of independent cinema, constantly imitated but never bettered. There is less
showing off here; no memorable monologues, a mostly linear structure and a move
away from the regular appearances of Tim Roth, Harvey Keitel, and Steve Buscemi
that had featured in Tarantino’s films so far. Pam Grier, Robert Forster and
Robert De Niro all appear with Samuel L. Jackson returning as another ruthless
criminal. It may bear less of the Tarantino-esque trademarks but it still
stands as a classic crime caper, clever and assured filmmaking, and a wonderful
homage to films that influenced Tarantino.
Kill Bill
Volumes 1&2 (2003 and 2004) are the first of Tarantino's foolishly split
double bills. Originally meant to be one film, a decision was made by Tarantino
with most likely a great deal of input from Harvey Weinstein to cut the film
down the middle and unfortunately turned one roaring rampage of revenge into
two volumes that decreased in quality as a result. Kill Bill Vol. 3 might be alive and possible according to the most recent reports, no doubt due to the original films having a lot of
fans with their samurai-flavoured, Shaw brothers inspired bloodletting. Owing a
considerable debt to Lady Snowblood (1973) which provides a template for The
Bride’s story of vengeance, it is filled with references to little known kung-fu films and proved that Tarantino was a director as comfortable with fight
scenes as with dialogue. The pair of films also marked his second collaboration
with his muse Uma Thurman after her iconic part as Marcellus Wallace’s moll in
Pulp Fiction.
If Tarantino’s
career could be divided up into chapters like one of his films, there would
certainly be a chapter called “The Rodriguez Situation”. Best buddies Tarantino
and Robert Rodriguez joined forces on iffy anthology Four Rooms (1995),
directing separate episodes in the odd collection of stories centring on Tim
Roth’s hotel bellhop. Tarantino later guest directed a scene in Rodriguez’s Sin
City (2005) before the pair officially collaborated on their Grindhouse (2007) double
feature, directing one film each to be marketed and screened as one cinematic
experience.
Tarantino’s
Death Proof suffered in comparison next to the gloriously gory thrills of Rodriguez’s
Planet Terror but still has Kurt Russell as a stunt driving psycho and a fierce
car chase that puts stunt woman Zoe Bell (Uma’s stunt double in Kill Bill) right
where she belongs; wriggling around on the bonnet of a speeding car being
slammed by Kurt Russell's death machine. Death Proof deserves the style over
substance accusation of many of Tarantino’s films but the physically scratched image
is wonderfully grimy and though it is completely chronological, it still
features plenty of typically Tarantino-esque dialogue. Americans got to see the
double bill as intended complete with fake trailers in the middle. However Britain
got shafted again by the money men with another terrible decision to release
both films separately.
Inglourious
Basterds was a serious return to form for Tarantino. It is another blood thirsty
tale of revenge and the first of what could potentially become his historical
trilogy. Mixing biggest-star-in-the-world Brad Pitt with up-and-coming actors
like Michael Fassbender and introducing English speaking audiences to the
majesty of Christoph Waltz, it is possibly Tarantino’s most brutal and bonkers
creation. Waltz’s Colonel Landa is another of Tarantino’s ingenious creations,
a smooth-talking sadist who is as comic as he is hideous, almost as over the
top as the astonishingly violent cinema-set climax. Nazi’s hunt Jews, Jews hunt
Nazi’s and Hitler appears only long enough for Tarantino to completely rewrite
the history books.
Django Unchained is a typically brutal and sadistic look at slavery in the
South. Samuel L. Jackson reappears, Tarantino takes another small role as in many of his previous films, and Leonardo DiCaprio joins Tarantino’s memorable list of
sick and twisted nasty bastards. It's a tough watch; both funny, cathartic and occasionally unbearable.
Untouchable
Tarantino can work with anybody he chooses. From the moment he caught Keitel
for Reservoir Dogs to snatching John Travolta and Bruce Willis (at career low
points) in Pulp Fiction, Tarantino has a knack for canny casting. His
collaborations with Samuel L. Jackson, Uma Thurman and most recently Christoph
Waltz have proved that he is a dream director to work for, despite apparently strangling
Diane Kruger on the set of Inglourious Basterds. Ticking off two of the biggest and
best males stars in Pitt and DiCaprio, he has confirmed that he and Johnny Depp
wish to work together one day in the future. Promising to retire at 60 after a couple more films, we must savour every drop of Tarantino that he has to offer,
with or without Depp.
So what is Tarantino-esque and why has it become such
a commonly used word for cool characters, cooler dialogue and quality
filmmaking; both cult-inspired and mainstream-influencing? His soundtracks are
slick hand-picked play lists; his casts revive the careers of has-beens and
introduce bright new stars and his ripping off of obscure cult cinema creates
fitting homage to little seen movies. His worlds are filled with furious
revenge fantasies, sadistic violence and shot through with distinctive style. From
out-of-the-trunk-of-car shots, non-linear narratives, occasional uses of black
and white to his foot fetish and corpse eye view shots, Tarantino is
recognizable from his films' stylistic flourishes as much as his monologues and often
dazzling dialogue. His influences are many; he is a cinematic magpie, taking
from what he pleases, unchained by genre conventions and creating something new
from the old. His impending retirement is just another reason to revisit his
cinematic oeuvre ahead of The Hateful Eight’s UK release on 8th
January 2016.
28 Days Later: In the House, In a Heartbeat
London
is a hectic place. Normally filled with more traffic and pedestrians than seems
humanly possible, people crammed this close together tend to get edgy. What if
a terrifying virus got unleashed that turns the inhabitants of the UK into rage
fuelled running zombie monsters known as the ‘infected’? Before imagining the UK as a green and pleasant isle of wonder for
the opening ceremony of the London Olympics, Danny Boyle cleared the streets of
London to
envisage a truly shocking zombie apocalypse.
Recently roused from a coma, bicycle courier Jim (Cillian
Murphy) checks himself out of a deserted hospital and finds London completely empty. The bustle of the
city is dead, left only with an eerie stillness. This is what London will look like when the apocalypse
comes. Desolate, forsaken and forgotten. The survivors are hiding out of sight.
The Infected appear from nowhere like rabid dogs intent only on attack. The
film later has Jim and other survivors shop in empty supermarkets and travel
down empty motorways all in search of an army base that promises hope. But when
the world goes to hell, is it really the army we should be turning to for help?
John Murphy’s
entire soundtrack is a master class in atmospheric horror scoring, but as all
hell breaks loose at the climax of 28
Days Later, his In the House, In a
Heartbeat climbs to an explosive crescendo over six minutes of beautifully
shot, visceral violence.
Our three surviving characters (a man, a woman and a teen
girl) have dodged death at the hands of rage infected super-zombies, only to
find themselves in the ‘safety’ of an army base populated by aggressive male
soldiers who have a scary attitude to women.
As hero Jim escapes the soldiers’ clutches and begins a
rage-fuelled rampage with the help of some unleashed Infected, Murphy’s music
builds and builds; quiet and calm at first with just two piano notes, then
joined by mounting acoustic guitars and climaxing with drums crashing, electric
guitar pounding and the visuals on screen becoming more and more terrifying as the
deadly mixture of frightened soldiers, vicious Infected and one angry
protagonist face off in the confines of the dark mansion. This is music to gouge out eyes to.
Listen:
In the Heart of the Sea Review
Ron Howard
gets right to the heart of the true story that inspired Herman Melville to write Moby
Dick. Reteaming again after the success of Rush with Chris Hemsworth, and more
importantly DOP Anthony Dod Mantle, Howard goes beyond Melville's story of man
vs whale to reveal the harrowing tale of survival that followed the sinking of the whaling
vessel Essex in the 1820s.
Melville
(Ben Whishaw) visits an old Tom Nickerson (Brendan Gleeson), last survivor of the Essex and
offers him a wodge of cash in exchange for the full story on what went down in
the middle of the ocean all those years ago. So begins Nickerson's version of
events; a story of conflict between Captain George Pollard (Benjamin Walker) and First Mate Owen
Chase (Chris Hemsworth), as the two men hurl their ship across the oceans in pursuit of whales. Their
quest for whale oil brings them into conflict with a giant monster of the sea;
a white whale that won't even stop when it has destroyed the Essex itself.
Survival at
sea has rarely looked so horrible, even after the likes of Life of Pi and
Unbroken. The whale is the least of this crew's worries once the Essex goes
down. Storms, sun, starvation; attack of the Hollywood skinniness. By the end,
Hemsworth and his fellow survivors look like zombies as they resort to
unspeakable actions in order to survive. You'll soon forget that you're
watching Thor and the future Spider-Man Tom Holland face to face, as their eyes become
sunken holes in their scrawny heads.
As the
months aboard the Essex pass, there's a sense of excitement and adventure every
time the crew find whales. But mixed with the majesty of the great creatures is
the tragedy of their hunting, killing and butchering. Howard and Dod Mantle
find the oily business grotesque and it shows in the inky, off-kilter
cinematography. In fact, In the Heart of the Sea very clearly becomes Dod
Mantle's film as it goes on. The shot choices become more bold and more stark
as the situation for the crew gets more desperate.
In its
heart, it’s a conflicted film. Hemsworth skips around the sails in typical hero
style, but then the film mourns the first whale he manages to kill. He's
clearly more cut out for the sea than his captain, who for the first half at
least, is set up as the villain. But things get far more interesting once the
monster whale turns up and cuts them all down to size. Howard does a decent job
of making us sympathise with the men, investing just enough to make a few of
the characters register above their blooming beards.
But the
whale is the real heart of the sea. The tagline of Jaws: The Revenge said it
best: This time it's personal. The incredible creatures might all be made of CGI, but that big
white whale steals the show. Smashing, crashing and chasing his foes in payback
for the family it has lost, it's a stark reminder of how nature can respond
if men keep abusing the planet so arrogantly and recklessly.
In the Heart of the Sea is an epic odyssey of survival; much bigger,
more emotional, and more exciting even than this year’s other great disaster
story, Everest.
Watch the trailer:
Seen it? Let me know what you thought in the comments or on Twitter @ilovethatfilm