Showing posts with label 3D. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 3D. Show all posts

Thursday, 4 September 2014

Goodbye to Language (Adieu au Langage) Review



Perhaps Jean Luc Godard's latest experiment in cinema, image, ideas and technology is impossible to critique. It is a piece of art after all; open to wildly differing interpretations and not designed in any way to be an easy or identifiable experience for the audience. Bursting with ideas but difficult to enjoy, I found it insufferable even at 70 minutes.

There is no real narrative to speak of; a dog wanders and a man and woman meet and spout frequently nonsensical philosophical mumblings. Divided into two sections (that seem to constantly overlap), Goodbye to Language explores nature, the image as metaphor, and it’s all in some of the most headache inducing 3D you will ever see.

Narrative and character are not important however and though the dog, a mostly naked woman and a mostly shitting man recur throughout the film, we learn little of them. The man talks to the woman while on the toilet with the sound of him shitting being about as inviting as the nonsense he spouts from his mouth. The woman is naked which we are helpfully reminded is not an issue in nature as to dogs there is no such thing as the concept of nakedness. Similarly when the dog decides to roll around in what is possibly more shit, you can't help but feel that by watching the film, the audience is doing the same.


Godard experiments wildly with discontinuous editing, abrupt sounds and changes in volume which should be in some way exciting but here comes across as simply annoying. While I'm certain Godard isn't after approval, especially from those who like their cinema with a good story and interesting characters, it is still difficult to see the artistic merit in much of the film.

However, there are some moments that are briefly interesting. The 3D in particular is used in new and at times bravura ways. Godard would make James Cameron squirm in his seat with ugly compositions with objects placed frustratingly in the foreground and assaulting the eyes. Even more daring is the placing of two separate images placed over one another so that each image can only seen by closing one eye behind the 3D glasses.


No matter how odd this all seems, there is occasionally a point emerging. One shot has the subject caged by the image and there is a reference to kamera meaning prison in Russian. The voices in the story hold a disdain for the image and while it flits between philosophical essay, the world's worst home video and incomprehensible poem, Goodbye to Language warns that people will soon need an interpreter to understand what is coming out of their own mouths. Warning: if this film is anything to go by, then I already need an interpreter.

As the film loops, repeats and uses some of the same techniques over and over, many will likely be desperate to say Goodbye to Language, to Godard, to cinema and even to life itself. Its musings on God, animals, sex, death and ... um... whatever are rarely mind blowing and the technical experimentation on display is more ugly than exciting.

Call me a heathen, a philistine, or anything you like but as one 'character' declares near the end: 'I hate characters'. I could not agree less. Goodbye to Language is so frustrating, so difficult to just enjoy or engage with, that it very nearly makes me want to say goodbye to art, hello Michael Bay... almost.

Goodbye to Language is screening at the BFI London Film Festival 2014 on Oct 13th at 6.30pm at the BFI IMAX. Tickets on sale from 18th September. 


More on the BFI London Film Festival 2014

More on the Cannes Film Festival 2014

Reviews of other films being screened at the festival:

White God

Timbuktu 

Wild Tales (Relatos Salvajes) 

The Blue Room (La Chambre Bleue) 

The Salvation 

Foxcatcher

Mr Turner

Sunday, 16 June 2013

Pre- and Post-Viewing Experiences and Conditions of Reception: The Relationship between Audiences and Films Part 7



The enjoyment of a film can also be affected by the pre and post-viewing experiences of the person who watches it and where and how they watch it. For example if a viewer watched all the trailers, promotional clips, interviews with the stars etc before a film is released, they may have extremely high expectations of the film. This might mean the film fails to meet these expectations. Comedies often have many of the best jokes in the trailers of the films and these jokes will not be as funny when they are in the final film if you have seen the trailer a few times. Similarly many trailers give a great deal of the story away and show many of the best stunts. The recent Fast and Furious 6 trailer seemed to have clips from all the major set-pieces and therefore there was no sense of surprise when watching the film. Prometheus was also a victim of its excellent marketing because people had huge expectations and the film was not as good as many had hoped.


Before or after a film, reading reviews might also affect a person’s enjoyment of a film. Sometimes I read a review and I can’t get the words of the writer out of my head and it ends up affecting my opinion. For this reason many wait till after they have seen a film to read any reviews. Also discussing a film after it has finished can potentially change your opinion of it. Though I still love The Dark Knight Rises, hearing people pick out the all the plot holes has lessened my love for it a little bit.


How you watch a film is also important as watching a film at an IMAX cinema with state of the art sound is a very different experience to watching a film on a mobile phone or a dodgy pirate DVD copy. Blockbusters particularly are supposed to be seen on a big screen in a dark room with the sound up loud to get the full audio visual experience. If an audience is laughing in a comedy or screaming in a horror, it will likely have an effect on other viewers. Watching a film with mates is different to watching it with parents or on a first date and watching it alone is very different to watching it with a large audience. All these factors can affect enjoyment and interpretation. 3D is supposedly more immersive but many hate it and some people have home cinema set ups because they would rather watch a film in their own home. I also find that if I see a really good film early (at a preview before it is released) I think I often love it even more than if I was (seemingly) the last to see it. I certainly feel the need to talk about it more to convince more people to go and see it.

And that is the end of this series on the relationship between audience and films. Hope you enjoyed it. Please feel free to argue with me all you want it the comments below and check out the other posts in this series. All the links are below:


Did you miss...?
Part 2 on the pleasures of film watching
Part 5 on the effects of film.
Part 6 on fandom.

Friday, 6 July 2012

2012 Releases Ranked: Top 10

Yesterday I listed the nine less good films of 2012 here.  Because I'm a useless critic and enjoy most films I see and would hate to give any competently made, mildly entertaining movie anything less than 5/10, there have been no real stinkers for me yet!  I have about a hundred others I still need to see but will be waiting for the rental.  Without further ado, this is my top 10 of 2012 so far.  Please click the titles for more of my drivel:





















What do you think?  Am I stuck in the 90s putting Titanic as the best film of 2012?  Have I got a fetish for woods with Hunger Games and Cabin so high up the list?   Or maybe I've got a thing for the Hemsworth brothers?  Is Chronicle really better than Avengers?  Is anything better than The Avengers?  Is this whole list pointless with the impending rise of the Dark Knight?

Tuesday, 1 May 2012

April Round-Up: Part 2


Welcome back!  Just to be unconventional, here's my top 11 films of April!  If you missed the bottom 11, please click here.

11. Salmon Fishing in the Yemen (Lasse Hallstrom, 2012)
Fortunately this is not the world’s dullest documentary.  It’s actually an ok film about faith with a bit of romance.  Review here.


10. The Vanishing (George Sluizer, 1990)
Pretty ridiculous tale of a man obsessed with finding out what happened to his vanishing girlfriend.  The lengths this guy finally goes to are absurd but do lead to a brilliantly bleak ending.


9. The Night of the Hunter (Charles Laughton, 1955)
The kids aren’t alright.  They’re being chased by a lunatic.  A classic that stands the test of time... mostly.  In many ways this is way ahead of it's time.  I could see them remaking this quite effectively but they would be hard pushed to find someone to beat Robert Mitchum's eerie performance.  I never realised just how huge a homage Spike Lee was giving this film with the Radio Raheem Love Hate speech in Do the Right Thing.


8. Lars and the Real Girl (Craig Gillespie, 2008)
Or Ryan Gosling and the surprisingly understanding community.  When an odd but pleasant chap brings home a blow up doll, the community goes along with his declaration that she is a real person.  It's a sweet and sympathetic film that relishes in the goodness of people.  Therefore it's hard not to like.


7. Vanishing Point (Richard C. Sarafian, 1971)
Like Easy Rider but with just one guy and a car.  The death of the sixties never looked so cool or so exciting.  Great car action, a naked girl on a motorbike and an outstanding soundtrack.  Existentialist cinema at its best.


6. A Night to Remember (Roy Ward Baker, 1958)
And a film to remember too.  James Cameron bought the rights to this before making his ‘version’ and clearly took notes from this impressive production.


5. The Day After (Nicholas Meyer, 1983)
One hour into this drama you have a spectacular series of explosive shots that send this film spiralling down into chaos and calamity.  It then turns harrowing and unforgettable.  An important film.


4. Tomboy (Celine Sciamma, 2011)
A beautifully observed slice of life about a little French girl who just wants to be one of the boys. Really well observed and engaging.  Features absolutely perfect performances from it's young leads, particularly the titular tomboy.  A little bit heartbreaking but also incredibly inspiring.


3. 21 Jump Street (Phil Lord, Chris Miller, 2012)
Laughed my ass off.  Haven’t seen so many dick jokes in a film for awhile but when they’re this funny, who am I to complain?  The sequence when the two protagonists take the new recreational drug of choice had me laughing harder than I have in a film for a long time.  Side-splitting, and totally irresponsible stuff.


2. Cabin in the Woods (Drew Goddard, 2012)
Plays with horror conventions while playfully mocking the horror movie audience.  Smart, funny and probably even cool for non-horror fans.  See review here.


1. Titanic 3D (James Cameron, 2012)
Ok so it's not a new film but it has been upgraded and I did see it in the cinema.  Still unbelievably epic.  I have lost absolutely no love for this film and it was a great experience to see it while being very aware that the Titanic was on its voyage 100 years ago to that very night.  The 3D works brilliantly in places and not so great in a few others.  Nevertheless my heart will go on for this and you can read why here and here.  I’ll never let go Jim Cameron.  I’ll never let go.


To top it all off, I am in the process of arranging a meeting with legendary production designer Peter Lamont of Titanic and Bond film fame.  You can be sure I will be blogging about this if I make it happen.

So what do you think of my list and rankings?  Should the infamous Human Centipede 2 have been top of the list?  Is it unfair to put Titanic 3D as number one?  Am I clinically insane?  How come I don't rate old films as high as new films?  What have you seen from this list and what's your favourite?

Sunday, 8 April 2012

Why I Love Titanic: Part 2


Happy Easter everybody!  I know it should be all about The Ten Commandments or The Passion of the Christ today but there's still only one movie on my mind at the moment.  Aaah Titanic!   I'm not finished with you yetI get some very strange looks when I tell people my favourite films include Fight Club, City of God and Titanic.  So this is the second part of my attempting to justify my love for this big, grand, epic love story.

 
Before I start though, I must point out that I am aware Cameron has played with the facts and obviously added in two completely fictional characters to juice up the story of the sinking.  There's even a great moment on one of the special features documentaries where a Titanic historian tries to tell Cameron that the lifeboats weren't being lowered right on top of each other and Cameron dismisses the historian saying something like 'I'm making a movie here!'  Terrible arrogance or a director who knows how to make a thrilling film?  Anyway here's some more reasons for my undying love for James Cameron's Titanic.

Historical accuracy

It's not just the sets and the costumes that are filled with historically accurate detail.  Cameron also wrote many real life characters into the script.  Most famously, Cameron depicts the band that played presumably until the tilt of the ship made it impossible to continue. Their bravery in the face of disaster becomes just one more heartbreaking story of those that did not survive the sinking.

Other real life victims that appear in the film are Benjamin Guggenheim who did allegedly say the line "We've dressed up in our best and are prepared to go down like gentlemen", John Jacob Astor, the richest man on the ship and the famous Molly Brown (played by Kathy Bates) who insisted that her lifeboat return to the sinking to search for survivors.  There’s also the moment the chairman of the White Star Line Bruce Ismay slinks on board one of the lifeboats despite the remaining women and children who were left to die.  Thomas Andrews did really speak with the Captain after the collision and made it very clear that the ship would sink.  He was even last seen staring at a painting over the fireplace as seen in the film. 

Sources have stated that the Captain was last seen in the wheelhouse and the baker who stands right next to the fictional Jack and Rose as Titanic finally sinks below the water was actually there and was one of the few who survived!  


The incredible story of Chief Baker Charles Joughin was told in the book A Night to Remember.  These were his final moments on the ship as he (and Jack and Rose) are the last into the water:

“The deck was now listing too steeply to stand on, and Joughin slipped over the starboard rail and stood on the actual side of the ship.

He worked his way up the side, still holding onto the rail--but from the outside--until he reached the white-painted steel plates of the poop deck.  He now stood on the rounded stern end of the ship, which had swung high in the air some 150 feet above the water.

Joughin casually tightened his lifebelt.  Then he glanced at his watch--it said 2:15.  As an afterthought, he took it off and stuck it into his hip pocket.  He was beginning to puzzle over his position when he felt the stern beginning to drop under his feet--it was like taking an elevator.  As the sea closed over the stern, Joughin stepped off into the water.  He didn't even get his head wet.” http://dunner99.50webs.com/titanic/joughin.html

These are just a few of the characters and Cameron wonderfully weaves his fictional characters into this real life tragedy and takes the audience on a memorable trip through a terrifying night of chaos and confusion.  He even has time to sneak in a reference to this famous photo taken aboard the ship in happier times.

The message

Titanic is entertainment first and foremost.  It’s a thrilling, tragic love story.  But it’s also a memorial to the 1514 people who lost their lives on 15th April 1912.  It’s a film about class, about the arrogance of mankind and surprise, surprise, about never letting go. It's themes may not be subtle but they are relevant and powerful.

Cameron relishes the class divide of the ship juxtaposing the stuffy first class dinner and men retiring to the brandy and cigar lounge with the boisterous dancing, drinking and partying of the steerage quarters.  When the ship sinks, the heartbreaking plight of the steerage passengers is again contrasted with the arrogance, nonchalance and selfishness of some of the first class passengers and even some of the crew that are determined to maintain social order in the face of disaster.


It’s also a film about arrogance with so many men being convinced of the invincibility of the ship, that it was released with only enough lifeboats for 1,178 people, only one-third of Titanic's total capacity.  And these were not even filled properly as depicted in the film.  This is a lesson that we can still learn from.  Did you know… “a change in the New York City building code in 1968 reduced the number of stairwells required in tall buildings.  The World Trade Center, completed in 1970, had fewer escape routes than the Empire State Building, completed in 1931.”  (102 Minutes, Jim Dwyer and Kevin Flynn) I wonder how many more lives could have been saved on 9/11 if safety was more of a concern to building designers/owners than profit.

Anyway Titanic is also just a love story.  Cameron could have made it more of a docudrama but he adds in the fictional characters to make it a more mass appealing story of love conquering class divide, disaster, and finally death.  Roses’ life changes after she meets Jack.  Even though he doesn’t get to enjoy her new life with her, he has become the catalyst for her escape and freedom.  She never lets go of her promise to him and never looks back.

Cashing in?

But after all that love, I have to ask is this re-release really necessary?  I realized the other day that not once had I really thought about the victims of the disaster when discussing the upcoming 3D release of the film in cinemas.  It’s supposed to commemorate the centenary of the disaster but really isn’t it just celebrating the film?  Then again, anyone who goes and watches the film will be hard pushed to not walk out of the cinema and think of all the real life lost souls that were involved in the tragedy.

But does it really need to be in 3D?  Cameron’s hyping of Avatar lead to a bit of disappointment as we all know that 3D isn’t the game changer that the director suggested it would be.  I’m all up for seeing Titanic again on the big screen where it belongs but I’m not convinced the 3D will add anything to the experience.  However if Robbie Collin of the Telegraph is right we should be in for a treat:


“In the film’s audacious 25-minute prologue, in which Bill Paxton’s treasure hunter introduces us to the barnacle-encrusted wreck of the Titanic, a third dimension makes the silty lifelessness of the ship that bit more tangible. When we slip back to 1912 and join Rose and Jack on the Southampton quayside, the riot of background detail and foreground drama feels richer and more vibrant than ever.” http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/filmreviews/9185820/Titanic-3D-review.html

So will you be going to see Titanic on the big screen this time around?  Why do you love/hate this film?  Has anyone seen the 3D version yet?  What are your thoughts?

Saturday, 7 April 2012

Why I Love Titanic: Part 1


I think I love Titanic more than many (especially men maybe?) but isn’t this new release a bit pointless?

Let me get a couple of things straight.  Firstly, I was always slightly fascinated with the sinking of the legendary ship on its maiden voyage.  Before James Cameron’s film existed, I had read A Night to Remember, a highly detailed and well-researched book about the events that took place that night.  Secondly, I loved the work of director James Cameron.  Terminator 1 and 2 are still two of my favourite films of all time, Aliens is easily the best of that franchise and True Lies is a really fun action movie.  

But on the other hand, in 1997, I was 16 years old and put off by the soppy, romantic look of the film, not to mention Celine Dion hogging the number one spot in the charts.  I was intrigued by stories of the amazing production design and the escalating budget but not enough to make a trip to the cinema.  But then a friend raved about it.  He told me the entire plot and although I didn’t get why an old woman would throw away a priceless necklace at the end, my friend emphasized the fact that pretty much the whole last hour was an action film.

So I went along to see it with the friend who had told me the whole story.  He said he would be happy to see it for a second time which also made me optimistic.  I was blown away.  I loved every moment of it: from the romance to the tragedy to the brilliant special effects, music, sets and costumes, even Dion warbling over the credits.  Here’s why:

The music

Ok forget My Heart Will Go On for a minute and look beyond to James Horner’s masterful score.  From the haunting sadness of Never an Absolution and Hymn to the Sea to the awe-inspiring Southampton and Take Her to Sea Mr Murdoch that perfectly capture the magic and majesty of the ship, it is one of my favourite soundtracks.  And then there is the perfect blend of horror, sadness and wonder created by tracks like A Building Panic, The Sinking and Death of Titanic.  Yes it all might sound a little too Enya inspired at times and Celine Dion’s vocals spell it all out rather pointlessly by the end but nevertheless this is a grand and epic score that has an undeniably HUGE part to play in creating the emotional response of the viewer. 


The cast

Kate Winslet shines as the trapped rich girl Rose, promised to a man she doesn’t love and desperate for adventure and escape.  Her character is the best written and carries the film from forbidden love to horrific tragedy to quiet optimism.  Leo is slightly short-changed as Jack Dawson, saddled with some cheesy lines and a fairly two-dimensional character in comparison.  But he does get stand-out moments like when he teaches the rich folk he has been invited to dinner with a thing or two about living life to the fullest. 


Rounding out the love triangle that puts Twilight to shame is Billy Zane as Cal, Rose’s fiancé and a bit of a pantomime villain bastard.  Zane gets a bit of flack for his eyebrow acting in this film; all that’s missing is a moustache to twirl and crazy maniac laughing but actually his final moments in the film reveal that he isn’t quite the total bastard he appears to be for the rest of the film.  And his delivery of the line ‘not the better half’ when Rose tells him ‘half the people on this ship are going to die’ is a deeply chilling moment of cinematic villainy. 

The love story

Somebody once told me Titanic was Romeo and Juliet on a boat.  With Leo just coming off Baz Luhrmann’s take on that Shakespearean tragedy, it was easy to believe.  But unlike R&J, we have a surviving member of the doomed couple to relate the story to us.  Yes it’s a tragic love story and Rose is promised to a man she does not love, while her family disapproves of her new found bit of rough Jack but the class dimension adds a lot more to this tale of forbidden romance.  Her mother wants what is ‘best’ for Rose (and herself) and Cal might actually truly love her.  But her desire for more from her life leads her into a collision with the free spirited Jack and it’s a romance we can root for.

It also has one of the sexiest scenes in cinema history.  No, not the couple copping off in the back of a car (“Put your hands on me Jack”) but the moment Jack draws Rose ‘like one of his French girls’.  The sparkle in Winslet’s eyes as she disrobes for the blushing Jack is irresistible.

The ship

From the outset, Cameron was determined to spare no expense when it came to technical realism. That was why he built three massive sets in huge, man-made, concrete-lined "lakes" for the movie's shooting. It was also why he rented a submersible to dive down to the real Titanic wreck and photograph it. And it was why he demanded that the set designs--from the style of the carpeting to the patterns on the wood moldings--faithfully re-create the original.


Given those demands, giant scale models were the only viable option. Unlike most sea-based films, which make heavy use of models measuring a mere 10 or 15 feet long, Titanic would come as close as possible to the real article. Engineers on the project ultimately built a scale model measuring 775 feet long--about 90% of the size of the original” http://www.designnews.com/document.asp?doc_id=226839

How cool is that?

The sets had to tilt and be capable of being flooded in order to recreate the legendary and terrifying sinking.  “In terms of cost and practicality, the only solution was hydraulics. To raise and lower it 15 times a night, there was no other way."  It is this that gives the climax its breathtaking and horrific power.  The practical effects and scale of the sets used is phenomenal.  Watching the special features shows Cameron orchestrating organized chaos on the huge, mesmerizing replica sets and every frame that features the interiors of the ship is a testament to production designer Peter Lamont.

Tomorrow I will post part 2 where I will consider the historically accurate details Cameron included in the film, the messages that can be taken from the story, and whether this new 3D release is cashing in or commemorating.